How Should Start-Up Biotechnology Companies Manage Learning and Generate the Necessary Knowledge to Achieve an Alliance-Based Stage of Growth

Abstract

Ethical drugs can take hundreds of millions of dollars and over 10 years to bring to market. Start-up biotechnology companies are recognized for their unique exploration and then exploitation in the development of future drugs. However, these potential new drugs are highly unpredictable and require a broad scope of inquiry. Significant and complex knowledge along with openness to learning is required because of the unusually high risk and uncertainty of biotechnology. After initial start-up, biotechnology companies often form a strategic partnership with an established pharmaceutical company to get additional funding and incorporate needed later stage development knowledge.

To conclude an alliance, a company needs to develop learning processes that transition the organization to the next stage of growth. These processes advance the technology sufficiently to conclude a strategic deal. Effective learning enhances exploitation of knowledge needed to generate unique insights and understandings related to the development of a new drug.

This paper examines seven biotechnology companies and identifies key processes that should optimize “effective learning” to enhance the probability of creating the necessary new knowledge needed for a start-up to achieve an alliance stage of growth. Despite a majority of the companies successfully reaching the scaling-up stage of growth, some ultimately fail due to a lack of one or more the explored factors.

 

 

https://doi.org/10.5912/jcb878
Requires Subscription or Fee PDF

Unless specified by prior arrangement, the author agrees to the following terms and assurances:

  1. For myself and on behalf of the other authors listed on this work, I assign to thinkBiotech LLC the copyright* in the contribution for the full term throughout the world.
  2. I/we further give to the following assurances
    1. I am the sole author of the contribution, or, if not, I have the written authority of the other authors to transfer the copyright* to thinkBiotech LLC and give these warranties;
    2. I and (where appropriate) the other authors are entitled to transfer the copyright to thinkBiotech LLC and no one else would be entitled to prevent us from publishing the contribution;
    3. To the best of my/our knowledge, all the facts in the contribution are true and accurate;
    4. The content of the contribution is entirely original to me (and where appropriate to the other authors) or, if not, the written permission of the owner of the copyright in any material copied from elsewhere has been obtained for all media (all such permissions to be attached to the contribution as supplementary files);
    5. Nothing in the contribution is obscene or libellous;
    6. Nothing in the contribution infringes any duty of confidentiality which I/or the other authors may owe to anyone else.
    7. I and/or the other authors have obtained the appropriate clearances from my/our employer(s) or other concerned institution(s).
* Works by US government employees prepared as part of official duties are in the public domain and the authors are therefore exempt from copyright assignment.