A Patient Centric Commercial Model for Cancer Care
Requires Subscription or Fee PDF




Cancer is one of the most challenging diseases of all - not only in terms of the clinical barriers to offering its sufferers respite from devastating consequences, but also to manufacturers and marketers of treatments that attempt to control its impact. Products developed and manufactured through biotechnology dominate the commercial landscape for treating a variety of cancer types. The recent spate of new biologic launches for treating cancer delivered through injections, infusions and orally will only increase in the next five years. The task of developing a viable commercial model for the effective delivery of cancer treatments to its customers lies at the center of ensuring that advances in cancer care are harnessed for their full potential. Both by definition and due to the reality of the cancer landscape, such a model is best conceptualized with the patient at its center. This article describes elements of a patient centric commercial model for cancer care, after recognizing the challenges and opportunities inherent in its commercialization and marketing. The impact of such a model resides in its ability to offer tangible benefits to patients by improving access to leading edge treatments, energizing communication at the point of care, and adequately harnessing the emerging promise of new technology - rather than an emphasis on share-of-voice based selling. By viewing the patient at the center of a commercial model, manufacturers and marketers of cancer care treatments can offer products that provide ongoing care for the cancer patient from initiation through palliation, thereby building loyalty and realizing the full potential inherent in such treatments.

Requires Subscription or Fee PDF


Cancer Facts & Figures; 2012. American Cancer Society Inc.

Media Centre, World Health Organization. www.who.int

DataMonitor, Therapy Area Analysis, Oncology, 2011


Generating growth through patient-centered commercial strategies; Sanjay K. Rao; Journal of Medical Marketing; November 2012



Economic burden of metastatic bone disease in the U.S., Schulman KL, Kohles J, CANCER, 2007, June 1; 109(11);2334:42

Payer costs for inpatient treatment of pathologic fracture, surgery to bone, and spinal cord compression among patients with multiple myeloma or bone metastasis secondary to prostate or breast cancer; Arie Barlev; Xue Song; Boris Ivanov; Vidya Setty; and Karen Chung; Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy; v16, No. 9, Nov/Dec. 2010

Biosimilars Advisory Service, Physician Perspectives on Biosimilar GCSFs and MABs in Oncology, September 2010, Decision Resources

Aiming for more real world data, AZ cozies up to IMS Health; Marc Iskowitz, January 12, 2012; Medical Marketing & Media

Thorne et al, 2005. Is there a cost to poor communication in cancer care? - A critical review of the literature. Psycho-Oncology, 14: 875-884

Humphreys, GF, 2000. Listen to the patient. It frightens me. Its personal. Hurry. Cancer 89(2), 229-231

Hotson, K. 2003; Can lack of communication kill? Can Fam Physician, 49: 492-495; Schaefer et al, 2002; Patient information in radio-oncology results of a patient survey. Strahlenther Onkol 178 (10): 562:571; Stead et al, 2003, Lack of communication between healthcare professionals and women with ovarian cancer about sexual issues. Br J. Cancer 88(5); 666-671

Armstrong J., Holland J. 2004; Surviving the stresses of clinical oncology by improving communication. Oncology (Huntingt) 18(3): 363-368

Carlson et al 2003. Benefits of psychosocial oncology care: Improved quality of life and medical cost effect. Health Qual Life Outcomes 1(8)

DiGianni et al 2000. Communication styles in the cancer consultation: Preferences for a patient-centered approach.Psycho-Oncology 9(2) 147-156; Chrystal et al 2003. The use of complementary/alternative medicine by cancer patients in a New Zealand regional cancer treatment center. N Z Med J 116(1168); U296

Higginson IJ et al 2002. Communication in end of life cancer care: A comparison of team assessments in three European countries. J. Clin Oncol 20(17): 3674-3682

Simpson et al. 2001 Effect of group therapy for breast cancer on healthcare utilization. Cancer Pract 9(1) 19-26.

Spiegel D. 1994. Health caring: Psychosocial support for patients with cancer. Cancer 74(4 suppl): 1453: 1457

Beckjord EB, et al. What do people affected by cancer think about electronic health information exchange? Results from the 2010 LIVESTRONG Electronic Health Information Exchange Survey and the 2008 Health Information National Trends Survey.

Cook G. Digital patient engagement: next steps in the providerâ€patient relationship. Oncology Business Review. http://www.oncbiz.com/journalâ€obrgreenâ€201203.php. 2012 March;26â€29.Accessed April 30, 2012.


Joint Principles of the Patient Centered Medical Home: http://www.pcpcc.net/content/joint-principles-patient-centered-medical-home Starfield B, S. L.(2005).Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. The Milbank Quarterly, pp. 457–502.

http://cmoh.org/ & Medical Home Concept Comes To Oncology, By Lola Butcher; Oncology Times: 25 February 2011 - Volume 33 - Issue 4 - pp 45-47



Cancer Care For The Whole Patient – Meeting Psychosocial Health Needs; The National Academies Press; Nancy Adler and Ann Page, Editors; Accessed December 20, 2012 at www.nap.edu

LIVESTRONG, Cancer Survivor Surveys, Report, May 2011

Hui D, et al "Availability and integration of palliative care at US cancer centers" JAMA 2010; 303: 1054-61.

National Cancer Institute, Bulletin; September 9, 2008; v5 / No. 18

‘Improving Palliative Care For Cancer’; Institute of Medicine; National Academy of Sciences; June 2001

Didem S.M. Bernard et al, National estimates of out of pocket healthcare expenditure burdens among nonelderly adults with cancer: 2001-2008; Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2011, July; 29(20): 2821-2826.



Unless specified by prior arrangement, the author agrees to the following terms and assurances:

  1. For myself and on behalf of the other authors listed on this work, I assign to thinkBiotech LLC the copyright* in the contribution for the full term throughout the world.
  2. I/we further give to the following assurances
    1. I am the sole author of the contribution, or, if not, I have the written authority of the other authors to transfer the copyright* to thinkBiotech LLC and give these warranties;
    2. I and (where appropriate) the other authors are entitled to transfer the copyright to thinkBiotech LLC and no one else would be entitled to prevent us from publishing the contribution;
    3. To the best of my/our knowledge, all the facts in the contribution are true and accurate;
    4. The content of the contribution is entirely original to me (and where appropriate to the other authors) or, if not, the written permission of the owner of the copyright in any material copied from elsewhere has been obtained for all media (all such permissions to be attached to the contribution as supplementary files);
    5. Nothing in the contribution is obscene or libellous;
    6. Nothing in the contribution infringes any duty of confidentiality which I/or the other authors may owe to anyone else.
    7. I and/or the other authors have obtained the appropriate clearances from my/our employer(s) or other concerned institution(s).
* Works by US government employees prepared as part of official duties are in the public domain and the authors are therefore exempt from copyright assignment.